ASR F1 '92 @ Imola Sun 1st Feb 19:00 GMT
-
- Legends Admin Team
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:39 pm
Re: ASR F1 '92 @ Imola Sun 1st Feb 19:00 GMT
Results and replay .VCR updated on homepage, click for full results on simresults.
Last edited by SteveC on Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Steeve Fournier
- Novice
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:37 am
Re: ASR F1 '92 @ Imola Sun 1st Feb 19:00 GMT
I raised duct at 6 and lower brake pressure at 82% to make sure they will survive. I like to slam the pedal to the bottom though. Having your duct at 1 is the main problem i think.maiph wrote:I was running brake-blanking 1, brake pressure 97%. radiators 5.Steeve Fournier wrote:what was your brake % and duct?
It must be something to do with my style then? Championship projection on existing data; I will retire every race!
So if this failure can be ruled out, great.
I'm very surprise that Grant was using duct 1 and 100% pressure and didn'T had problems. He surely drives a lot different than me.
Steeve
Life is short, ride fast
- maiph
- Legends Admin Team
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:38 pm
- Location: nottingham UK
- Contact:
Re: ASR F1 '92 @ Imola Sun 1st Feb 19:00 GMT
Thanks Steeve I will try that. I also usually like a lower brake pressure so I can floor the pedal without locking up but at Imola I found more pressure gained time, and I didnt smoke the tyres much. Maybe this is because of high downforce or a mod-physics anomaly?
The brake-blanking term I think has caused my confusion. It suggests that a lower number means less 'blocking' and hence more airflow. Obviosly the reverse is true!
The brake-blanking term I think has caused my confusion. It suggests that a lower number means less 'blocking' and hence more airflow. Obviosly the reverse is true!